Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
car accident redux
#16
If one is driving a vehicle without a valid license, they should be charged with being at "fault."

I disagree. "Fault" is not the lack (or possession) of a driver's license. "Fault" is the actions (or non-actions) of a driver.

Driving without a license is an infraction, but does not assign fault. I'd like to see it made a criminal offense, the same as driving on a suspended/revoked DL. But it's not.

Still, that's different from the liability of actually causing a collision.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
car accident redux - by bazookaman - 04-16-2010, 07:10 PM
Re: car accident redux - by mikebw - 04-16-2010, 07:18 PM
Re: car accident redux - by mrbigstuff - 04-16-2010, 07:29 PM
Re: car accident redux - by AlphaDog - 04-16-2010, 07:29 PM
Re: car accident redux - by Mini 9 - 04-16-2010, 07:33 PM
Re: car accident redux - by RAMd®d - 04-16-2010, 07:39 PM
Re: car accident redux - by rjmacs - 04-16-2010, 07:50 PM
Re: car accident redux - by billb - 04-16-2010, 07:55 PM
Re: car accident redux - by Acer - 04-16-2010, 10:02 PM
Re: car accident redux - by bazookaman - 04-17-2010, 12:13 AM
Re: car accident redux - by macphanatic - 04-17-2010, 01:58 AM
Re: car accident redux - by katkramer - 04-17-2010, 02:52 AM
Re: car accident redux - by billb - 04-17-2010, 12:52 PM
Re: car accident redux - by macphanatic - 04-17-2010, 01:55 PM
Re: car accident redux - by JoeH - 04-17-2010, 02:57 PM
Re: car accident redux - by RAMd®d - 04-17-2010, 03:03 PM
Re: car accident redux - by macphanatic - 04-17-2010, 06:28 PM
Re: car accident redux - by RAMd®d - 04-17-2010, 06:34 PM
PS... - by RAMd®d - 04-17-2010, 06:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)