05-13-2011, 02:59 AM
Dennis S wrote:
I can't come to a conclusion in my mind on this one. Maybe someone has a convincing argument.
What part are you stuck on?
There doesn't seem to be anyone alleging that there is a factual error at his latest trial. He originally stated that he did not work at the Sobibor slaughterhouses, but dropped that after the prosecution produced an ID card for him that placed him there.
Are you saying that you are confused as to why someone who personally took part in the slaughter of nearly 30,000 people (out of some 250,000 murdered in that camp) has committed a crime?