Demjanjuk - guilty or not guilty?

[Chakravartin]

rjmacs wrote:
Okay. The short answer is no, if the witness did not know beforehand that the crime was going to occur. However, if the witness knew beforehand that the crime had been planned, they are guilty as an accessory to the rape and murder.

You can't think of any other crime under those circumstances...?

...

Apparently, you can't distinguish between the criminal law and a moral imperative. Without that foundation my answer to your third question would be gibberish to you.