06-05-2012, 06:04 PM
The terminology is common and specific legal language to encourage the government (state, local, federal, yadda) to allow this as an 'exclusion' to rules. It's nothing more than setting up protections for future lawsuits.
The economic reality is that the earnings of those of us with more testosterone has been eroding, and will eventually drop to those of you with more estrogen. Of course this is not the goal.. the goal is 'parity' at the top, not at the bottom, C'est l'economie.
Do men earn more than women for the same work ?
Yes. Yes they do.
Is this fair ?
No. No it is not.
Is this a clear indication of the oppression of women throughout history ?
No. Merely relates back to the concept of the economic worth of a person with lower upper body strength in a subsistence farming unmechanized unindustrialized third world type environment.
The economic reality is that the earnings of those of us with more testosterone has been eroding, and will eventually drop to those of you with more estrogen. Of course this is not the goal.. the goal is 'parity' at the top, not at the bottom, C'est l'economie.
Do men earn more than women for the same work ?
Yes. Yes they do.
Is this fair ?
No. No it is not.
Is this a clear indication of the oppression of women throughout history ?
No. Merely relates back to the concept of the economic worth of a person with lower upper body strength in a subsistence farming unmechanized unindustrialized third world type environment.