Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Black Panthers intimidation case revisited
#3
The court ruling says nothing about "interference", it talks about "conferring". The conferring might have been interference but there is nothing in the article to support that - that seems to be an unnecessarily provocative word choice on the part of the author.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Black Panthers intimidation case revisited - by Ted King - 08-02-2012, 05:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)