10-22-2012, 09:44 PM
Lance did test positive on at least one occasion. At least once he bribed or pressured officials to get away with it.
Moreover, there's no statute of limitation on doping offenses. Why should an athlete be able to get away with cheating simply because it's undetectable now?
I think the disincentive to doping is far greater if the athlete knows that he can be stripped of his winnings down the road.
Moreover, there's no statute of limitation on doping offenses. Why should an athlete be able to get away with cheating simply because it's undetectable now?
I think the disincentive to doping is far greater if the athlete knows that he can be stripped of his winnings down the road.