Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Walmart v. the District of Columbia
#17
Bill in NC wrote:
but not wage laws that apply unequally based on whether or not the employer is a certain size, or unionized - that's the issue.

living wage laws have all sorts of stipulations - public employees only, all employers that do business with the city, etc. I've seen much more restrictive living wage rules than this one.

That being said, I have no idea how this particular law will fair.

the part about collective bargaining agreements overriding the living wage law is standard language in this type of bill. It's moot because the union is not going to be negotiating for lower wages.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by WOOF - 07-10-2013, 02:20 AM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-10-2013, 10:37 PM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-11-2013, 10:50 AM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by Lemon Drop - 07-12-2013, 02:13 AM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by RgrF - 07-12-2013, 05:40 AM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-12-2013, 05:46 AM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 02:48 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 04:52 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 05:56 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 10:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)