Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Walmart v. the District of Columbia
#20
Lemon Drop wrote:
the part about collective bargaining agreements overriding the living wage law is standard language in this type of bill. It's moot because the union is not going to be negotiating for lower wages.


But of course they will negotiate a wage lower than the $12,50.
Of course they will negotiate for less than your " living wage" .
Otherwise they would not NEED that exception, would they?.....
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by WOOF - 07-10-2013, 02:20 AM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-10-2013, 10:37 PM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-11-2013, 10:50 AM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by RgrF - 07-12-2013, 05:40 AM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-12-2013, 05:46 AM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 02:48 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 04:52 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 05:56 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 10:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)