Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Walmart v. the District of Columbia
#23
max wrote:
Lemon, you trying to teach politics of collective bargaining to a former Teamsters negotiator,
Of course they will negotiate lower wages, if that is their market reality, $12.50 is a political sop for useful tools....

That makes no sense. It's not your "market reality" if there is a minimum wage law to support a higher wage. That's your minimum starting point for negotiating, not lower.
Again, please provide ONE single example of any union that ever took a lower wage than the existing municipal minimum.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by WOOF - 07-10-2013, 02:20 AM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-10-2013, 10:37 PM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-11-2013, 10:50 AM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by RgrF - 07-12-2013, 05:40 AM
Re: Walmart v. the District of Columbia - by max - 07-12-2013, 05:46 AM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 02:48 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by Lemon Drop - 07-12-2013, 04:22 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 04:52 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 05:56 PM
Re: The District of Columbia v. Walmart - by max - 07-12-2013, 10:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)