Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Flac to Apple Lossless
#11
deckeda wrote:
if you're using ALAC you're presumably playing back via iTunes?

Yes. However, an advantage ALAC has over FLAC is that I can preview an ALAC-encoded song in a Finder window; I can't do that with FLAC.


deckeda wrote: What's the advantage with another ripper? Batch capability?

More flexibility with regard to where and how files are saved.

iTunes' folder structure is a pain in the ass and, as you know, defaults to a subdirectory in the user's home directory on the startup drive. I did not want to save these files there because:

1) Lossless rips of my 600+ CDs would blow out my 1 TB startup drive
2) Wanted to save to a RAID 1 server so as to have a back up copy of the rips in case of a drive failure

Batch capability will be an advantage if I ever decide to transcode from ALAC to FLAC.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Flac to Apple Lossless - by Microman - 11-24-2013, 04:00 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by colonel panic - 11-24-2013, 04:52 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by hal - 11-24-2013, 04:57 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by deckeda - 11-24-2013, 05:44 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by deckeda - 11-24-2013, 05:46 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by N-OS X-tasy! - 11-24-2013, 06:27 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by deckeda - 11-24-2013, 09:39 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by N-OS X-tasy! - 11-24-2013, 10:28 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by deckeda - 11-24-2013, 10:59 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by WHiiP - 11-24-2013, 11:25 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by N-OS X-tasy! - 11-24-2013, 11:38 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by Sam3 - 11-25-2013, 10:08 AM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by N-OS X-tasy! - 11-25-2013, 11:31 AM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by dan steinberg - 11-25-2013, 06:21 PM
Re: Flac to Apple Lossless - by cindytamiola - 02-18-2014, 12:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)