04-30-2014, 09:23 PM
LD: Certainly a distance of 100 miles makes the connection less plausible. I was going on the subhead in the Mail story that read:
to which the arrow on the map would seem to correspond. However, further down in the body of the story, I read:
which seems to be confirmed elsewhere, e.g. here:
http://english.astroawani.com/news/show/...h-31-34972
The distance is cited as 190 km, which is a little over 100 miles.
Whatever, the GeoResonance report is certainly worth pursuing. They claim they sent it to the relevant authorities back on March 31st, and received no replies, which could be a scandal in itself.
/Mr Lynn
The site - 1000 miles from Bangladesh in the Bay of Bengal - is at the northern tip of the initial search area
to which the arrow on the map would seem to correspond. However, further down in the body of the story, I read:
Tech firm GeoResonance claims its sensor technology has found the wreckage of a plane in the Bay of Bengal, 118 miles south of Bangladesh. . .
which seems to be confirmed elsewhere, e.g. here:
http://english.astroawani.com/news/show/...h-31-34972
The distance is cited as 190 km, which is a little over 100 miles.
Whatever, the GeoResonance report is certainly worth pursuing. They claim they sent it to the relevant authorities back on March 31st, and received no replies, which could be a scandal in itself.
/Mr Lynn