05-01-2014, 03:04 AM
I don't understand the reference in the CNN article to "satellite imaging capability at NASA." My impression was that the GeoResonance data was from airborne instruments. When I read "airborne" I think airplanes.
The CNN article says,
Edit: Just read Diana's exposition above. Good stuff. Need to re-read, but sounds like she is saying that some spectroscopic techniques can conceivably work from a distance (even from orbit?), but not NMR. That makes sense. Do we know if they're using aircraft or satellites? If the latter, would this company have had the resources to launch their own satellite(s)?
I haven't seen any discussion of the company's techniques. Do they claim they're using all the ones that Diana mentions? Link?
/Mr Lynn
The CNN article says,
The Adelaide-based firm GeoResonance has said that electromagnetic fields captured by airborne multispectral images some 118 miles (190 kilometers) off the coast of Bangladesh in the Bay of Bengal showed evidence of aluminum, titanium, copper and other elements that could have been part of the Boeing 777-200ER, which disappeared from radar on March 8 while en route from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing.
Edit: Just read Diana's exposition above. Good stuff. Need to re-read, but sounds like she is saying that some spectroscopic techniques can conceivably work from a distance (even from orbit?), but not NMR. That makes sense. Do we know if they're using aircraft or satellites? If the latter, would this company have had the resources to launch their own satellite(s)?
I haven't seen any discussion of the company's techniques. Do they claim they're using all the ones that Diana mentions? Link?
/Mr Lynn