Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there?
#30
Given who shot the pic, I would assume that a denial would be quick, either by the Royals spokesperson or the photographers, if this were actually 'shopped.

So until someone officially steps up to say it's legit, I'll assume it's not.

I would bet money she's wearing a thong, something slightly more modest than the typical floss variety.

And given that there are other pics out there, I thing this is a pretty cheap shot.

Maybe Diane needs the clicks.

I'd rather think this was the work of some minion.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - by RAMd®d - 05-29-2014, 02:31 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)