10-19-2014, 03:49 PM
I don't disagree with you...
But 15 years is probably the low end of what he's ELIGIBLE for, for that many counts of exposing himself to (presumably under-age) girls. Unless they find evidence of "other activities", I REALLY doubt he'd be charged, prosecuted, and/or sentenced that way.
Lesson here: Don't misake "Team" for "Tina" (or whatever his girlfriends name is) when sending a whackoff video...
But 15 years is probably the low end of what he's ELIGIBLE for, for that many counts of exposing himself to (presumably under-age) girls. Unless they find evidence of "other activities", I REALLY doubt he'd be charged, prosecuted, and/or sentenced that way.
Lesson here: Don't misake "Team" for "Tina" (or whatever his girlfriends name is) when sending a whackoff video...
RAMd®d wrote:
I'm guessing still WAY fired...
It makes good business sense.
Whether he's innocent or guilty, the administration can be cast as taking a pro-active approach.
Even if he is guilty, 15yrs is ridiculous for the crime committed. One year max, followed by five years probation, and maybe become a registered sex offender.
If he's innocent, six months in County, credit for any time served, no probation, no sex offender status. You can never be too careful.