03-28-2015, 08:10 AM
saying that he had gotten “real negative on smartwatches” — only to later turn around and describe it as a “ little piece of art.”
Because he's negative on smart watches means he'd not allowed to appreciate one as art?
No doubt there's context in the article to justify the "only to turn around…" bit.
But I don't think I'll be taking the bait.
I would take a Rolex, however.
Because he's negative on smart watches means he'd not allowed to appreciate one as art?
No doubt there's context in the article to justify the "only to turn around…" bit.
But I don't think I'll be taking the bait.
I would take a Rolex, however.