03-28-2015, 04:16 PM
RAMd®d wrote:
I also find it incomprehensible that an appeals court can find someone guilty after they've already been found not guilty. It really boggles the mind.
As far as I'm concerned, it's the same principle as finding some innocent after they've already been convicted.
Until it happens to you...
So, you're saying that the state should get as many "do-overs" as it wants until it finally finds a jury that will convict. Are you serious? :nuts:
The state shouldn't even try someone unless it's very sure that it has everything it needs to convict someone.