03-29-2015, 04:22 AM
N-OS X-tasy! wrote:
[quote=freeradical]
[quote=RAMd®d]
I also find it incomprehensible that an appeals court can find someone guilty after they've already been found not guilty. It really boggles the mind.
As far as I'm concerned, it's the same principle as finding some innocent after they've already been convicted.
So, you're saying that the state should get as many "do-overs" as it wants until it finally finds a jury that will convict. Are you serious? :nuts:
That's not at all what he said. What he said is that, in his opinion, one scenario is logically equivalent to the other.
And that is the problem.