07-23-2016, 07:25 PM
Ted King wrote:
[quote=samintx]
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/d...ks-emails/
Is this going to cause a ruckus in the Democratic party? Will Hillary have to explain?
There was already a fair amount of evidence that the leadership at the DNC was favoring Clinton - which they had no business doing. I'm not sure about the ruckus factor but I'll bet that Sanders made the pragmatic decision a while back to put his valid outrage about the shenanigans at the DNC aside for now until Trump is defeated, so to the degree that his "followers" take their lead from him I don't think there will be too much of a ruckus about it - at least not until after the election.
The Democratic Party is obligated to present what it believes is it's best candidate to face the opposition. There is no requirement to anything other that this. They are a private organization. Sanders wasn't even a Democrat. He ran and he lost 100% fair and square. If you don't believe this to be true, demonstrate how it wasn't.