08-13-2016, 04:14 PM
There was nothing good about Daily Beast taking that article down. What is good about a site publishing "an article that is in conflict with both our values and what we aspire to as journalists"?
First they got caught, then they edited it, then they apologized for it, then they finally took it down. This only after an enormous hue and cry from all sides on social media. Left to their own devices the article would probably still be sitting on their site, garnering lots of hits for its controversial nature and lacking the crocodile tears they splashed over it after getting in trouble.
No praise for Daily Beast. In fact, I've blocked them on social media. Buh bye.
First they got caught, then they edited it, then they apologized for it, then they finally took it down. This only after an enormous hue and cry from all sides on social media. Left to their own devices the article would probably still be sitting on their site, garnering lots of hits for its controversial nature and lacking the crocodile tears they splashed over it after getting in trouble.
No praise for Daily Beast. In fact, I've blocked them on social media. Buh bye.