06-27-2019, 03:14 PM
They've run away from this issue for quite some time now. Each time they sent another case back or said it "wasn't ready" they signaled this day.
that the Constitution does not provide an adequate test
Right, because the Constitution doesn't have much to do with representation. Apparently.
And state judiciaries presumably base everything on random stuff not influenced by the Constitution, either.
But hey, it's good to know SCOTUS doesn't mind weighing in on election results.
I wonder if the next time Democrats gerrymander, conservatives will cry foul?
that the Constitution does not provide an adequate test
Right, because the Constitution doesn't have much to do with representation. Apparently.
And state judiciaries presumably base everything on random stuff not influenced by the Constitution, either.
But hey, it's good to know SCOTUS doesn't mind weighing in on election results.
I wonder if the next time Democrats gerrymander, conservatives will cry foul?