08-12-2019, 06:36 PM
Unfortunately, the seemingly non-tattooed Associated Press writer doesn't say why the heavily tattooed man killed. Other than being heavily tatooed, we know zero about it. Perhaps his victims lacked sufficient tattoos?
So it was most likely the tattoos. I mean, process of elimination, amirite?
Did we mention the tattoos? Because they're right there, in color. In the headline. All over. Can't miss 'em. Must be a reason they are there. What could it be? I know. You know. We all know.
Perhaps they'll pass a law that compels a taboo artist to inform clients when they are nearing the "killer" threshold of tattoos. "Well, OK, just this last one, but the next one will probably cause you to murder, OK?"
So it was most likely the tattoos. I mean, process of elimination, amirite?
Did we mention the tattoos? Because they're right there, in color. In the headline. All over. Can't miss 'em. Must be a reason they are there. What could it be? I know. You know. We all know.
Perhaps they'll pass a law that compels a taboo artist to inform clients when they are nearing the "killer" threshold of tattoos. "Well, OK, just this last one, but the next one will probably cause you to murder, OK?"