04-19-2021, 07:09 PM
Prosecution: believe your eyes
(the attorney was really much better than that)
Defense: do not believe your eyes
- use the “reasonable cop” perspective and not eyewitnesses (seriously!)
And if that was not enough of an insult, there’s this:
“At the end of the case, when we’re done with these arguments, the court will instruct you on how to deal with these biases and the perception issues,” he told the jury. “The court’s final instructions will guide you to try to recognize your biases, recognize what we bring to the table and analyze the evidence from the perspective of the evidence itself.”
Translation: You, the jury, are biased against my client, you’re just too dumb to know it. He gets an “A” for effort on that one, by crossing the line IMO.
- Chauvin could not have committed murder because murder requires intent and no cop ever intends to murder when being captured on video.
Again with the gaslighting!!! It couldn’t be murder, because you saw it!
(the attorney was really much better than that)
Defense: do not believe your eyes
- use the “reasonable cop” perspective and not eyewitnesses (seriously!)
And if that was not enough of an insult, there’s this:
“At the end of the case, when we’re done with these arguments, the court will instruct you on how to deal with these biases and the perception issues,” he told the jury. “The court’s final instructions will guide you to try to recognize your biases, recognize what we bring to the table and analyze the evidence from the perspective of the evidence itself.”
Translation: You, the jury, are biased against my client, you’re just too dumb to know it. He gets an “A” for effort on that one, by crossing the line IMO.
- Chauvin could not have committed murder because murder requires intent and no cop ever intends to murder when being captured on video.
Again with the gaslighting!!! It couldn’t be murder, because you saw it!