10-28-2023, 03:24 AM
CONVICTION for violent felony, so domestic violence restraining order, although laudable, isn't constitutional because there has been no CONVICTION yet.
Involuntary commitment for violent mental illness beyond a 72 hour hold is reasonable, with the caveat that if you become no longer a danger to yourself and others you can get your Right back.
Just remember, that your voting Rights don't get taken away unless you are convicted. Nothing you say loses your voting, free speech, due process, search and seizure, religion etc etc etc unless there is a conviction for a felony or possible sentance over a year. It varies on that state to state.
Pre-emptive firearms loss, even temporary, for Red Flag laws shouldn't be Constitutional, no matter how badly we want it. That is a slope we should never set foot on. "A Right delayed is a Right denied."
Non-violent felonies shouldn't count. Kiting checks doesn't make you a physical danger to your community, nor does lying to get food stamps for your kids. The Bryan Range case will probably clear up the non-violent felon issue. There is also an 18USC 922g3 case covering drug use, of great interest to the Biden family. Both dad and son. One of the 2 is going to lose. History of prohibition on carrying drunk is proven, but smoking pot last week has no practical actual impact on your firearm handling today. Pot IS still against the law, regardless of what a state may have voted.
Sensative places without their own specific dedicated security shouldn't be allowed in my opinion. Unless you take serious active steps to keep us safe, and take full responsibility for any negative outcome, let us carry. If you don't have trained armed security and metal detectors in place, it isn't enough.
The Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness includes in the Right to Life the Right to Self Defense to preserve our own life. That is obvious, or should be. I'd like to see someone argue we don't have the Right to defend our own life.
You asked, and I answered.
Involuntary commitment for violent mental illness beyond a 72 hour hold is reasonable, with the caveat that if you become no longer a danger to yourself and others you can get your Right back.
Just remember, that your voting Rights don't get taken away unless you are convicted. Nothing you say loses your voting, free speech, due process, search and seizure, religion etc etc etc unless there is a conviction for a felony or possible sentance over a year. It varies on that state to state.
Pre-emptive firearms loss, even temporary, for Red Flag laws shouldn't be Constitutional, no matter how badly we want it. That is a slope we should never set foot on. "A Right delayed is a Right denied."
Non-violent felonies shouldn't count. Kiting checks doesn't make you a physical danger to your community, nor does lying to get food stamps for your kids. The Bryan Range case will probably clear up the non-violent felon issue. There is also an 18USC 922g3 case covering drug use, of great interest to the Biden family. Both dad and son. One of the 2 is going to lose. History of prohibition on carrying drunk is proven, but smoking pot last week has no practical actual impact on your firearm handling today. Pot IS still against the law, regardless of what a state may have voted.
Sensative places without their own specific dedicated security shouldn't be allowed in my opinion. Unless you take serious active steps to keep us safe, and take full responsibility for any negative outcome, let us carry. If you don't have trained armed security and metal detectors in place, it isn't enough.
The Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness includes in the Right to Life the Right to Self Defense to preserve our own life. That is obvious, or should be. I'd like to see someone argue we don't have the Right to defend our own life.
You asked, and I answered.