03-23-2006, 04:18 PM
Whose writing are you refering to?
I don't see where I said that the HD is larger than the Mini itself. What I said was that the 3.5" HD fills the MiniStack (and would have filled the entire guts of the Mini Mac also, hence the 2.5" SLOWER HD).
Having smaller doesn't mean I can't have larger!
I have a small case with a larger HD. And soon I'll have another case with an even LARGER HD. So LARGER, in a SMALLER package is just what the doctor ordered!
Of course you COULD add a FW solution that would be larger than the Mini itself. Such as one of the OWC RAID systems that look like the Cheese Grater. But aesthetics rule here at the House of 'Poo.
What else would you expect at a House of 'Poo?
edit:
btw.... that photo, depending on your monitor is pretty much actual size.
Hold a CD up to it. If there is about 1/2 inch on either side of the unit - then that's it!
I don't see where I said that the HD is larger than the Mini itself. What I said was that the 3.5" HD fills the MiniStack (and would have filled the entire guts of the Mini Mac also, hence the 2.5" SLOWER HD).
Having smaller doesn't mean I can't have larger!
I have a small case with a larger HD. And soon I'll have another case with an even LARGER HD. So LARGER, in a SMALLER package is just what the doctor ordered!
Of course you COULD add a FW solution that would be larger than the Mini itself. Such as one of the OWC RAID systems that look like the Cheese Grater. But aesthetics rule here at the House of 'Poo.
What else would you expect at a House of 'Poo?
edit:
btw.... that photo, depending on your monitor is pretty much actual size.
Hold a CD up to it. If there is about 1/2 inch on either side of the unit - then that's it!