Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NAD receiver died
#16
[quote maurycy][quote N-OS X-tasy!]
Honestly there isn't a 2.1 anything. The .1 refers to the subwoofer channel, which isn't present on a stereo receiver/amp, which is, by definition, two channels, not three.
Yes, stereo receiver only has two channels, but do not tell me that referring to left and right channel plus subwoofer I cannot call it 2.1 system. My stereo receiver has separate output for subwoofer.
I've never heard of a stereo receiver with a subwoofer channel, but apparently yours is, in fact, a 2.1 receiver. I stand corrected.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NAD receiver died - by abevilac - 07-24-2006, 07:00 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by Seacrest - 07-24-2006, 07:24 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by Spiff - 07-24-2006, 07:29 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by elmo3 - 07-24-2006, 07:29 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by mick e - 07-24-2006, 07:35 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by N-OS X-tasy! - 07-24-2006, 07:38 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by abevilac - 07-24-2006, 08:13 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by maurycy - 07-24-2006, 09:10 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by Seacrest - 07-24-2006, 11:39 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by N-OS X-tasy! - 07-25-2006, 12:08 AM
Re: NAD receiver died - by grad - 07-25-2006, 03:34 AM
Re: NAD receiver died - by maurycy - 07-25-2006, 01:00 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by N-OS X-tasy! - 07-25-2006, 02:02 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by maurycy - 07-25-2006, 02:36 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by abevilac - 07-25-2006, 03:25 PM
Re: NAD receiver died - by N-OS X-tasy! - 07-25-2006, 06:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)