08-03-2006, 06:07 PM
I don't see much of a benefit for RAID 1. RAID 1 is mainly for uptime - if a drive goes down your machine keep running. Otherwise you're a little bit better off with two backup drives for the money.
|
[?] NAS vs. Server
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
[?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 05:47 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by bryanus - 08-03-2006, 06:03 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by mattkime - 08-03-2006, 06:05 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by mattkime - 08-03-2006, 06:07 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 06:25 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by smacks - 08-03-2006, 07:38 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 07:51 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by smacks - 08-03-2006, 07:56 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by dotman - 08-03-2006, 08:19 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 10:09 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by mattkime - 08-03-2006, 10:23 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by kj - 08-03-2006, 11:45 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by smacks - 08-03-2006, 11:56 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-04-2006, 12:15 AM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by macphanatic - 08-04-2006, 12:55 AM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-04-2006, 01:07 AM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by RAMd®d - 08-06-2006, 05:43 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)