Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[?] NAS vs. Server
#6
I posted a topic a few weeks ago RE: this same issue, and as much as I thought a NAS box was the solution, mattkime and others convinced me to use my old G4 Sawtooth as a fileserver.

I added a cheap SATA controller, an inexpensive GigE card, 3 new SATA drives, and a copy of SuperDuper for easy drive-to-drive backups. For about $300 US , it just works flawlessly, and was far cheaper (and faster) than the most basic of NAS boxes—the "affordable" NAS devices didn't have GigE.

I think the only real advantages to a NAS device are power consumption, footprint, RAID 5 capability (Check out NAS Yellowmachine and Enfrant boxes...), and ease-of-setup for the less techno-centric. There are certainly not cheap.

Personally, I loved being being able to put this older machine into service, instead of the landfill...

Cheers, J
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 05:47 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by bryanus - 08-03-2006, 06:03 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by mattkime - 08-03-2006, 06:05 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by mattkime - 08-03-2006, 06:07 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 06:25 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by smacks - 08-03-2006, 07:38 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 07:51 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by smacks - 08-03-2006, 07:56 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by dotman - 08-03-2006, 08:19 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-03-2006, 10:09 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by mattkime - 08-03-2006, 10:23 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by kj - 08-03-2006, 11:45 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by smacks - 08-03-2006, 11:56 PM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-04-2006, 12:15 AM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by macphanatic - 08-04-2006, 12:55 AM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by M A V I C - 08-04-2006, 01:07 AM
Re: [?] NAS vs. Server - by RAMd®d - 08-06-2006, 05:43 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)