09-13-2007, 07:46 PM
i think its a "work" vs "home" thing -- but im not a pro photographer
all of the photos i shoot are of family -- iphoto is the best way to manage them by far -- having an edited vs original version is not a bug...its a great feature...other wise you need to "save as" all the time
again, thats for "home" use
i too use bridge for the rest of my files, about 200 gigs worth of manufacturers photos from CDs/DVDs/etc -- but i find bridges interface clunky and overall speed pretty slow. the interfacr acts like it wanted to be sorta like iphoto, but its not as good
i havent used the new CS3 bridge, which looks totally different...maybe i will like it more
not sure if i would use the new iphoto if i was a pro photographer, but i would give it a shot -- some of its organization looks top notch
all of the photos i shoot are of family -- iphoto is the best way to manage them by far -- having an edited vs original version is not a bug...its a great feature...other wise you need to "save as" all the time
again, thats for "home" use
i too use bridge for the rest of my files, about 200 gigs worth of manufacturers photos from CDs/DVDs/etc -- but i find bridges interface clunky and overall speed pretty slow. the interfacr acts like it wanted to be sorta like iphoto, but its not as good
i havent used the new CS3 bridge, which looks totally different...maybe i will like it more
not sure if i would use the new iphoto if i was a pro photographer, but i would give it a shot -- some of its organization looks top notch