Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NAS vs. NDAS
#15
i've been using the predecessor to this particular NAS model and been very happy with every aspect of it. Not the cheapest NAS on the block, but packed with well-implemented and Mac-friendly features.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6822110034

I just need to get a gigabit ethernet switch that supports jumbo frames to crank out a little more network throughput from the thing.

And yes, this NAS enclosure (and my older one) support AFP 3, so I don't have to worry about filenames getting messed up when I copy stuff from my Macs over to the NAS. I think read/write performance is supposed to be better than AFP 2, as well.

For what you're doing, I don't think you really need ACLs: can't you do the same thing by assigning both users to the same group? That works just fine for the two of us here.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NAS vs. NDAS - by deckeda - 11-28-2007, 03:22 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by microchip13 - 11-28-2007, 04:45 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by timg - 11-28-2007, 04:52 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by clay - 11-28-2007, 04:52 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by Silencio - 11-28-2007, 05:05 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by space-time - 11-28-2007, 05:16 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by M A V I C - 11-28-2007, 05:23 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by Sam3 - 11-28-2007, 05:54 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by DavidS - 11-28-2007, 06:27 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by deckeda - 11-28-2007, 06:55 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by M A V I C - 11-28-2007, 07:01 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by Buzz - 11-28-2007, 07:29 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by deckeda - 11-28-2007, 07:41 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by tahoedrew - 11-28-2007, 09:00 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by Silencio - 11-28-2007, 10:07 PM
Re: NAS vs. NDAS - by deckeda - 11-29-2007, 03:57 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)