Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy

incognegro Offline

Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 8,279
Threads: 628
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 0

#12

05-07-2008, 04:27 AM

don't know how many.
http://www.condenast.com/

4 locations in NYC, also in Chicago, LA, SF, Detroit, Atlanta, Wilmington, Milan, Paris...

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by Harbourmaster - 05-06-2008, 08:42 PM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by Jimmypoo - 05-06-2008, 09:02 PM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by Chris Y - 05-06-2008, 10:05 PM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by Silencio - 05-06-2008, 11:36 PM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by Dakota - 05-06-2008, 11:46 PM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by Ombligo - 05-07-2008, 12:07 AM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by N-OS X-tasy! - 05-07-2008, 12:25 AM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by incognegro - 05-07-2008, 02:20 AM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by cbelt3 - 05-07-2008, 02:20 AM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by mrlynn - 05-07-2008, 02:27 AM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by ztirffritz - 05-07-2008, 03:39 AM

Re: Why 'no Macs' is no longer a defensible IT strategy - by incognegro - 05-07-2008, 04:27 AM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)