06-04-2008, 01:50 AM
[quote Will Collier][quote Article Accelerator]
(BTW, I still don't get that "panning shots" assertion. Where did you hear that?)
I didn't hear it, I see it in everything I've ever transcoded to H.264. Still shots look great, motion looks great, pans look like garbage. I don't doubt that performance is better when it's a first-time encode from DV, though.
Well, that's not my experience at all. H.264 is a very flexible codec. Perhaps our different experiences are due to differing encoding settings?
(BTW, I still don't get that "panning shots" assertion. Where did you hear that?)
I didn't hear it, I see it in everything I've ever transcoded to H.264. Still shots look great, motion looks great, pans look like garbage. I don't doubt that performance is better when it's a first-time encode from DV, though.
Well, that's not my experience at all. H.264 is a very flexible codec. Perhaps our different experiences are due to differing encoding settings?