03-26-2006, 05:50 PM
As the developer sees it, the work required to create a Universal version of the now year-old CS2 combined with the fact that high-end Mac desktops aren't available yet would offer slim reward.
"It's far better to focus on making sure Photoshop CS3 is able to absolutely squeeze every ounce of power out of what I'm sure will be pretty spankin' Intel-based towers by that point than to do tons of work moving an old code base to new tools," he said.
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=14195
Here's the original blog from Adobe:
By now you have probably figured out that we aren't releasing Universal Binaries of our current application versions. If you haven't, all you need to know is pretty explicitly spelled out here.
"But, c'mon", I hear people saying, "Steve said it was just a recompile!" Or, "Back during the PowerPC transition, you guys released a patch!"
Well, this time is different. And I really wish it weren't. But let me tell you how...
http://blogs.adobe.com/scottbyer/2006/03/macintosh_and_t.html
"It's far better to focus on making sure Photoshop CS3 is able to absolutely squeeze every ounce of power out of what I'm sure will be pretty spankin' Intel-based towers by that point than to do tons of work moving an old code base to new tools," he said.
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=14195
Here's the original blog from Adobe:
By now you have probably figured out that we aren't releasing Universal Binaries of our current application versions. If you haven't, all you need to know is pretty explicitly spelled out here.
"But, c'mon", I hear people saying, "Steve said it was just a recompile!" Or, "Back during the PowerPC transition, you guys released a patch!"
Well, this time is different. And I really wish it weren't. But let me tell you how...
http://blogs.adobe.com/scottbyer/2006/03/macintosh_and_t.html