09-24-2008, 03:48 PM
:oldfogey:
Is there something wrong with 1920 x1200? 1600 x 1050 seems to be a low budget resolution that can display a clipped 1080 HD image. My guess it the 21" to 22" wide screens are benefiting from mass production of cheap panels for HDTV. There are several 1600 x 1200 displays at Newegg but they almost as expensive as the low end 24" displays.
Is there something wrong with 1920 x1200? 1600 x 1050 seems to be a low budget resolution that can display a clipped 1080 HD image. My guess it the 21" to 22" wide screens are benefiting from mass production of cheap panels for HDTV. There are several 1600 x 1200 displays at Newegg but they almost as expensive as the low end 24" displays.