11-26-2008, 06:51 PM
The title is just as logically wrong as the opposite conclusion. Probably _more_wrong. You absolutely can not conclude that we have not been safe "under GW". It is possible GW and the rest of the gov't has done a good job defending us from terrorism. Do you think it's likely there would have been no terrorism if we did absolutely nothing to stop it? If so, I would like to hear a compelling argument for why that would be advantageous for the terrorists. kj.