11-26-2008, 09:05 PM
His argument assumes someone believes other than this:
>>>they are still around
Mission was NOT accomplished
and the theory that fighting them over there will not require us to fight them here is naive at best<<<
As I explained, no one believes 1) the terrorists are no longer still around 2) the mission being accomplished means we won't have problems with terrorists ever again, 3) that we won't need to fight them here. If no one believes these things he's arguing with someone he's invented. There's your x. kj.
>>>they are still around
Mission was NOT accomplished
and the theory that fighting them over there will not require us to fight them here is naive at best<<<
As I explained, no one believes 1) the terrorists are no longer still around 2) the mission being accomplished means we won't have problems with terrorists ever again, 3) that we won't need to fight them here. If no one believes these things he's arguing with someone he's invented. There's your x. kj.