12-08-2008, 11:06 PM
swampy wrote:
Greg... The word "Muslim" never appeared in my opening post. But the linked movie is very accusatory because the way radical Muslims treat woman was the subject. It was not about the Christian, Jews, Shinto, or any other religious sect treats women. Or didn't you understand that? The movie was not made to compare the treatment of women by various religious sects. I'm assuming that is because not many other religious sects do treat their woman like that. Perhaps the FCLDS would fall into that minority group, but again that was not the point of the movie.
You mean the post with the subject "The Religion of Peace", right? The one that linked to a video about oppression in the Muslim world? It was also the one that directly linked Islam to terrorism. Absolutely right; you didn't use "Muslim"; you used a sarcastic euphemism.
Swampy wrote:
We cannot afford to lose the war on terror because this is what the Religion of Peace holds in store if we do.
The first post linked Islam and terrorism. You later decried linking young Muslim men to terrorism, but defended a quote of someone who apparently did. I don't want to put words in your mouth (you insult me when I do that), but I seriously am not sure what your thoughts are.