12-10-2008, 05:07 AM
>(the terrorists we're worried about are muslim, therefore all muslims are terrorists)?
>That a terrorist is going to be a MEM...okay. That a MEM is going to be a terrorist, no.
Aren't these equivalent statements?
You said:
>>Nobody said all Muslims are terrorists.
Then you say Swampy was implying:
>>That a MEM is going to be a terrorist, no.
and you disagree.
I agree with the first statement, that no one has said in this whole thread (or the article) that "a MEM is going to be a terrorist". Including Swampy. Yet, I know that several people think that's what Swampy is saying. And they probably assume that's what I'm saying too. kj.
>That a terrorist is going to be a MEM...okay. That a MEM is going to be a terrorist, no.
Aren't these equivalent statements?
You said:
>>Nobody said all Muslims are terrorists.
Then you say Swampy was implying:
>>That a MEM is going to be a terrorist, no.
and you disagree.
I agree with the first statement, that no one has said in this whole thread (or the article) that "a MEM is going to be a terrorist". Including Swampy. Yet, I know that several people think that's what Swampy is saying. And they probably assume that's what I'm saying too. kj.