12-20-2008, 06:36 PM
I was under the impression that a hand recount was done (or mandated in this case) when an election
was so close that it could not be called under conventional means.
This has obviously been planned for under the states election laws and that process is being played out.
Why should anyone concede ? Why shouldn't the process be allowed to run it's legal course ?
As long as we're at it, why shouldn't Coleman concede ? He is the on trailing - correct ?
was so close that it could not be called under conventional means.
This has obviously been planned for under the states election laws and that process is being played out.
Why should anyone concede ? Why shouldn't the process be allowed to run it's legal course ?
As long as we're at it, why shouldn't Coleman concede ? He is the on trailing - correct ?