Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
We're next
#14
I've read estimates of the strength of the New Madrid quake "in excess" of a 9.0... as in, changing land elevations measured in YARDS.

Seattle, also, has had 8.0+ earthquakes before us pasty-faced folk showed up.

My area, far-northern California, is also "overdue" for a modest quake. We've averaged a 5.5+ quake about every 9-10 years... it's been nearly 20.

I'll take earthquakes over hurricanes and tornado's though...
Damaging earthquakes only happen every few decades. BAD ones once or twice a century or so.
You hurricane and tornado folks get 'em every single freakin' year.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
We're next - by RgrF - 04-06-2009, 11:59 AM
Re: We're next - by mjgkramer - 04-06-2009, 12:05 PM
Re: We're next - by RgrF - 04-06-2009, 12:17 PM
Re: We're next - by Doc - 04-06-2009, 12:20 PM
Re: We're next - by RgrF - 04-06-2009, 12:50 PM
Re: We're next - by SDGuy - 04-06-2009, 12:57 PM
Re: We're next - by Lux Interior - 04-06-2009, 12:58 PM
Re: We're next - by billb - 04-06-2009, 01:05 PM
Re: We're next - by volcs0 - 04-06-2009, 01:07 PM
Re: We're next - by RgrF - 04-06-2009, 01:15 PM
Re: We're next - by RgrF - 04-06-2009, 01:15 PM
Re: We're next - by MacArtist - 04-06-2009, 02:27 PM
Re: We're next - by BigGuynRusty - 04-06-2009, 03:19 PM
Re: We're next - by Paul F. - 04-06-2009, 03:48 PM
Re: We're next - by Racer X - 04-06-2009, 04:17 PM
Re: We're next - by vision63 - 04-06-2009, 04:42 PM
Re: We're next - by (vikm) - 04-06-2009, 05:50 PM
Re: We're next - by kap - 04-06-2009, 10:57 PM
Re: We're next - by Doc - 04-07-2009, 10:00 PM
Re: We're next - by RgrF - 04-09-2009, 09:50 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)