04-21-2009, 06:07 AM
Only one side of the story here.
So, since this isn't a court of law, let's base our comments on the information at hand, after making an assessment of it's accuracy. Since it *seems* to me, with what we've been told, that this is a reasonably accurate account of the situation. So I stand by my post.
If the other guy shows up to tell his side, I'll reassess the situation and see if my position changes.
Even if he does, that just a "He Said/He Said" situation with no proof of who's correct.
Lack of proof not withstanding, it was clear to me that OJ killed Brown and Goldman based on his body language, even though he claimed to be innocent.
DaviDC could be telling a bald face lie to garner sympathy and attention. He could be giving a distorted, misremembered account because of a neurological condition.
But I think he's giving a reasonably accurate account. Maybe the "other guy's" post would change my thinking. But I'm thinking- "not so much".
So, since this isn't a court of law, let's base our comments on the information at hand, after making an assessment of it's accuracy. Since it *seems* to me, with what we've been told, that this is a reasonably accurate account of the situation. So I stand by my post.
If the other guy shows up to tell his side, I'll reassess the situation and see if my position changes.
Even if he does, that just a "He Said/He Said" situation with no proof of who's correct.
Lack of proof not withstanding, it was clear to me that OJ killed Brown and Goldman based on his body language, even though he claimed to be innocent.
DaviDC could be telling a bald face lie to garner sympathy and attention. He could be giving a distorted, misremembered account because of a neurological condition.
But I think he's giving a reasonably accurate account. Maybe the "other guy's" post would change my thinking. But I'm thinking- "not so much".