Anthony wrote:
Whoa, Nelly. There is also significant evidence that links vaccinations to seizures and health problems.
I think each parent has to make a choice based on what they feel is appropriate and deal with the consequences.
My point is that you don't have to be an unconscious religious freak to make this choice.
Here is the CDC summary of what is known about vaccines.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm
There is about a one in three-thousand chance of a fever leading to a febrile seizure, but these are not terribly serious, and they go away -- I'll leave the details to the doctors on the board here. Some people (including young children) have strong allergic reactions to vaccines. Again, the chance is incredibly small for most of us, but allergic reactions to vaccines, like allergic reactions to peanut butter, chocolate, or milk, are not unknown.
The argument that parents have to do their own research (not what Anthony said here, but a commonly made argument) and make up their own minds strikes me as fairly thin, to say the least. We don't say that parents should do their own research about putting their children in car seats or fastening their own seatbelts -- these are well established public health measures that were enacted into law based on a lot of data that was reviewed by real experts, and then considered by elected officials subject to the political process. Protecting the public from extremely dangerous, contagious diseases such as polio and diptheria is something that the public health system has long since figured out and ruled on. The fact that measles and chicken pox can be deadly, not only to adults but to children, is part of the equation. It just took longer for vaccines against these diseases to come into existence and gain widespread usage. The mortality for measles is only about one case in a thousand, but there was one such death in the UK this year due to their measles outbreak. That epidemic seems to be hitting the young adults who were not immunized after the Andrew Wakefield generated scare over the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine which began in 1998.
I don't agree that matriculating in the University of Google is the same as doing eight intensive years of anatomy, physiology, pathology, virology, bacteriology, therapeutics, obstetrics, etc etc. -- and just to begin these studies requires a background in chemistry and organic chemistry. So whenever I read some scientific illiterate arguing that "I did my research," I want to quote Dr Gorsky in telling them (I paraphrase here) that they don't understand the words they are using in the way that those words are understood among trained scientists.
Shorter version: When a backwoods German doctor named Robert Koch analyzed transmission of disease, he actually did his research and proved pretty conclusively that an infectious agent caused the disease, that it expanded itself in each new animal that received it, and that this could be carried on indefinitely from one animal to the next. Pasteur did similar work with rabies.
Even shorter version: The people who argue against the use of vaccines don't usually take the rational approach, which would be that there is some very small risk even to a very safe procedure -- instead, they make the totally ridiculous autism argument and to add injury to injury, claim that the vaccines aren't what really stopped polio and measles anyway. You really have to try hard to make that dumb an argument.