Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nashville movie theater shooting suspect pronounced dead Alleged gunman, armed with gun and hatchet, killed after firing
#11
Racer X wrote:
No. Everyone wants to blame the firearm. I'm just pointing out that he had other means. Endless means, to be realistic.

The problem is the people, not the means.

No, everyone blames the person and wants people like that to not have a gun.
Reply
#12
Racer X wrote:
No. Everyone wants to blame the firearm. I'm just pointing out that he had other means. Endless means, to be realistic.

The problem is the people, not the means.

No, people want to blame the ridiculously easy access to firearms. Besides, it's much too general to say things like "everyone wants" or even "people want" like I just did.

But what is true is that guns are different than other tools, different from other items that can be used as weapons like cars or bats or hatchets. We've seen time and time again that if a person wants to hurt a lot of people, a gun is the weapon of choice. So endless means is not very realistic at all.
Reply
#13
The means MAGNIFIES the damage the perpetrator can do. It would be much more difficult to kill 30 people with a hatchet than it would be with an AR-15. Does anyone actually believe those two devices should be treated the same in terms of limiting their access by the general public?
Reply
#14
RacerX,

Calm down, big boy, you're wrong. It can be a lonely feeling, but it will pass as soon as you realize that you're wrong! : )
Reply
#15
What a crock of garbage.

Yes, that was a WTF moment for me.

In fact, the whole "The next thing you know..." rant that happens everywhere (even here) is pretty sad.

I think it's a symptom of Old Man Syndrome.

How quickly the onset is followed by yelling at kids on one's lawn will indicate the rate of mental decline.

It's even faster if there aren't any kids actually on one's lawn.
Reply
#16
Yoyodyne ArtWorks wrote:
The means MAGNIFIES the damage the perpetrator can do. It would be much more difficult to kill 30 people with a hatchet than it would be with an AR-15. Does anyone actually believe those two devices should be treated the same in terms of limiting their access by the general public?

Exactly.

Plus the fact that using a gun is in many ways easier because it's much more abstract than using a blade or even clubbing someone..You stand anywhere and fire and you don't have to be near the person, there is no real connection in any intimate sense..you don't even have to look at em..it's a disconnect that makes it all the more appealing and efficient.
Reply
#17
From the one link, it appears no citizens or police were injured in the incident, except for two patrons who were OC'd.

Very fortunate.

As it certainly could have been much worse, I'm wondering the motivation of this particular individual. He had ability and opportunity and yet nobody was actually injured.

I don't like to jump to conclusions but suicide by cop seems like a possible motive.
Reply
#18
Kraniac wrote:
Plus the fact that using a gun is in many ways easier because it's much more abstract than using a blade or even clubbing someone..You stand anywhere and fire and you don't have to be near the person, there is no real connection in any intimate sense..you don't even have to look at em..it's a disconnect that makes it all the more appealing and efficient.
Would you be willing to talk to someone about these feelings?
Reply
#19
Racer X wrote:
He had a hatchet too. Time to villify the tool manufacturers, the lumber industry, and the roofing/siding industry. Oh, and the recreation and wood stove industries.

Oh, and flooring installers.

Heck, go after the Boy Scouts. They use hatchets too.

Any Dow Corning, the makers of Mace. And the National Parks gift shops, who sell bear repellant. Heck, go after the police, because the spray may have been stolen out of an unlocked police car.

Might as well add the auto manufacturers as hit and run or drunk drivers kill. Let's add in brewers and distillers. Don't forget the pharmaceuticals as many use prescription medications illegally.

Or maybe we should lock violent criminals up for good and put people with serious psychological issues in institutions that can help them. Then again, that would be logical.
Reply
#20
Black wrote:
[quote=Kraniac]
Plus the fact that using a gun is in many ways easier because it's much more abstract than using a blade or even clubbing someone..You stand anywhere and fire and you don't have to be near the person, there is no real connection in any intimate sense..you don't even have to look at em..it's a disconnect that makes it all the more appealing and efficient.
Would you be willing to talk to someone about these feelings?
As long as I can bring my giant club with me, I'm ok with it.

You want me to bring some Waffle House??
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)