Com. McCravens Perfect response to 45 revolving Brennan’s security

[samintx]

Is this coming: One by one revoking.......will become the NEW NORMAL nothing will happen against 45 just grumbling
however

if he revoked all on the list at one time...that would provoke a firestorm?

[max]

btfc wrote:
Observed, not invented. Nothing to do with McCarthyism at all..

Sure, not once were you able to argue the facts I posted, hence the reason for resorting yo your flaming McCarthyism, btfc.

Perfectly illustrated by you, btfc, in this very thread.....

[sekker]

max wrote:
[quote=btfc]
Observed, not invented. Nothing to do with McCarthyism at all..

Sure, not once were you able to argue the facts I posted, hence the reason for resorting yo your flaming McCarthyism, btfc.

Perfectly illustrated by you, btfc, in this very thread.....


Wow, you really are wearing some odd glasses these days, max. I thought you were AGAINST the police state? Attacks on a loyal American citizen by the President because that citizen caught the President in illegal/immoral/unsavory activities is the DEFINITION of the Police State.

EDIT: I'll just keep this link saved to remind you, max, of your hypocrisy each time you post a rant against the government.

[btfc]

Facts? Max ain’t got no facts! Max don’t need no facts!
Max don’t have to post any stinking facts!

[max]

btfc wrote:
I got nothing!

We know that, so why are you even posting here?....

sekker wrote:
Wow, you really are wearing some odd glasses these days, max. I thought you were AGAINST the police state? .

Yes, unlike you I am not a fan of the Police State, nomatter who it serves at the moment, but despite as much as you would like it, sekker, it is not a Police State issue,
If it was, your hero here, Brennan would be one of its top functionaries.
And it is quite ironic that he was being foisted by his own petard.
Your hypocrisy here is defending his comeuppance, sekker.
A head of one of the chief organs of the Police State being eaten by his own is quite illustrative and quite just.
It takes a very special, "it is only OK as long as we do it" hypocritical and partisan Kool-aide swiller to object to this just spectacle of a Police State ouroboros in action.
Yes, you should keep this reference to your raging hypocrisy...

sekker wrote: Attacks on a loyal American citizen by the President...
.

your perfect McCarthyism rears its ugly head here again, sekker, will "let us scour our institutions for unAmerican activities" be next?.
You are so deep into your McCarthy universe, you are totally blind to the irony of your own expression of McCarthy vocabulary permeating your argument defending it.
Have you composed your blacklists already of those who think or speak wrong, sekker?...

[btfc]

max wrote:

I'm max, an Intellectually dishonest hack with limited critical thinking skills, and I only come here to randomly throw crap against a wall, desperately hoping something might stick.

[btfc]

Max conducts research for one of his posts:

[Dennis S]

max wrote:
[quote=btfc]
I got nothing!

We know that, so why are you even posting here?....

sekker wrote:
Wow, you really are wearing some odd glasses these days, max. I thought you were AGAINST the police state? .

Yes, unlike you I am not a fan of the Police State, nomatter who it serves at the moment, but despite as much as you would like it, sekker, it is not a Police State issue,
If it was, your hero here, Brennan would be one of its top functionaries.
And it is quite ironic that he was being foisted by his own petard.
Your hypocrisy here is defending his comeuppance, sekker.
A head of one of the chief organs of the Police State being eaten by his own is quite illustrative and quite just.
It takes a very special, "it is only OK as long as we do it" hypocritical and partisan Kool-aide swiller to object to this just spectacle of a Police State ouroboros in action.
Yes, you should keep this reference to your raging hypocrisy...

sekker wrote: Attacks on a loyal American citizen by the President...
.

your perfect McCarthyism rears its ugly head here again, sekker, will "let us scour our institutions for unAmerican activities" be next?.
You are so deep into your McCarthy universe, you are totally blind to the irony of your own expression of McCarthy vocabulary permeating your argument defending it.
Have you composed your blacklists already of those who think or speak wrong, sekker?...


Foisted?

[sekker]

wow, I seem to have hit max's sensitive spot!

I am consistent in wanting to keep my liberties - seems like he only wants to keep them when convenient to support 'his' world view.

Like I said, I will keep this bookmarked each time max makes his police state posts. I guess he was only against the government when run by Dems.

[SteveG]

Dennis S wrote:
Foisted?

as opposed to 'secunded'?

At least he didn't try to shoot any softcore Sino-porn at you.