9/11 plead guilty! Amazing

[swampy]

Greg..."It's impolite to wish that people are killed by terrorists."

Who's wishing people will get killed by terrorists?

[Greg the dogsitter]

I thought you were, when you expressed a desire that the terrorists be moved into the homes of a war veteran, the president-elect, and some others.

[mick e]

That kind of hate-based rhetoric has gone the way of the Hummer, swampers.

[vision63]

swampy wrote:
I've got a idea. Close down Gitmo, send all the terrorists home so they can fight again and this time we won't take prisoners.

There are of course some Gitmo guys that we can't send home because their own countries won't take them back. In those cases there can be a lottery among the bleeding heart liberals as to who's homes they will be assigned to for room and board. I just hope John Murtha, Harry Reid, BHO, and several of my favorite BHL's would come up winners.

I'll throw in for a couple of them. Are there "any" women?

[$tevie]

I'd like to know if there are any cases on record of terrorists having offed their landladies. It might very well make one the safest person on the planet.

[swampy]

Greg the dogsitter wrote:
I thought you were, when you expressed a desire that the terrorists be moved into the homes of a war veteran, the president-elect, and some others.

Well, I thought all you libs wanted only the best for the Gitmo guys. Heaven knows the ACLU et al have insisted they are nothing more than civilian criminals that should be tried in a court of law rather than military tribunals. How 'bout farm some out to George Clooney, Sean Penn, Michael Jordan and all the other libs that say the Gitmo guys have been "unfairly" treated.

Now you're saying they are terrorists and may be bad guys... You libs can't have it both ways.

[swampy]

vision63 wrote:
[quote=swampy]
I've got a idea. Close down Gitmo, send all the terrorists home so they can fight again and this time we won't take prisoners.

There are of course some Gitmo guys that we can't send home because their own countries won't take them back. In those cases there can be a lottery among the bleeding heart liberals as to who's homes they will be assigned to for room and board. I just hope John Murtha, Harry Reid, BHO, and several of my favorite BHL's would come up winners.

I'll throw in for a couple of them. Are there "any" women?
LOL

[Greg the dogsitter]

"Terrorists" was your word. I used it to maintain the flow of the conversation.

The rest of your post seems somewhat disjointed. Can you name one thing you know about supporting a position?

[Greg the dogsitter]

Wait, wait...I didn't even notice this at first!

You totally begged off the whole idea of allowing terrorists to kill war veterans and the president-elect! You certainly alluded to it, then got a bit huffy, and then you made fun of me! Brilliance approach! Instead of pursuing a single thought, abandon it in favor of something more obtuse.

[Wags]

swampy wrote:
[quote=Greg the dogsitter]
I thought you were, when you expressed a desire that the terrorists be moved into the homes of a war veteran, the president-elect, and some others.

Well, I thought all you libs wanted only the best for the Gitmo guys. Heaven knows the ACLU et al have insisted they are nothing more than civilian criminals that should be tried in a court of law rather than military tribunals. How 'bout farm some out to George Clooney, Sean Penn, Michael Jordan and all the other libs that say the Gitmo guys have been "unfairly" treated.

Now you're saying they are terrorists and may be bad guys... You libs can't have it both ways.
That reminds me, I need to send the ACLU some more money.