Obama the great warrior?

[Grateful11]

Our troll is hungry again.

[Mac1337]

JPK wrote:


If you personally blame Bush for everything bad that happens, then you must at least show some concern for similar action by our new leader.

Not so if you are a political hack, which are in abundance here.

[swampy]

RgrF.."Swampy does it again. Who was the last real warrior to lead our nation swampthing?"

You missed the whole point of the OP. The dig was at the MEDIA. Perhaps it was too subtle for you?

You're like a bull in a china shop, RgrF. Calm down. go back to the OP and read the question and the answer then think about it.

[wurm]

Dennis S wrote:
...I hope he burns in hell.

Very classy. I hope there is a better entity than you or I to judge a person's actions and motives.

[$tevie]

The original post seems to be based on the idea that people objected to the war in Iraq for the sole reason that innocent people were getting killed. This is a gross over simplification of the reasons people have opposed the war. Either that or I just can't understand Swampy's truncated cliche-ridden right-wing-speak.

[Lux Interior]

I thought Obama made his intentions quite clear about Pakistan, including his willingness to hit targets within in if necessary.

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticN...6420070801

And this was before he had even secured the Democratic nomination. So, I don't think keeping up with this "campaign promise" is hypocrisy.

[$tevie]

wurm wrote:
[quote=Dennis S]
...I hope he burns in hell.

Very classy. I hope there is a better entity than you or I to judge a person's actions and motives.
If there is, I suspect that Bush is in deep do-do, at least according to the Christian Bible he is. He better hope that God cherry-picks the Bible the way the Evangelicals do.

[Dennis S]

{...the dolts who run the Senate. These are not smart people with the best interest of the people they represent (Dem or Repub)."

And Bush was?

[Mac1337]

$tevie wrote:
The original post seems to be based on the idea that people objected to the war in Iraq for the sole reason that innocent people were getting killed. This is a gross over simplification of the reasons people have opposed the war. Either that or I just can't understand Swampy's truncated cliche-ridden right-wing-speak.

Remember this?

We gotta stop air raiding villages and killing civilians.

There is no oversimplifying this. Killing women and children was the battle cry of Obama supporters. Now they are deaf, mum and blind.

What is striking is that he himself pretends nothing is happening while his air force air raids villages and crashes weddings.

[Dennis S]

Dakota wrote:
[quote=$tevie]
The original post seems to be based on the idea that people objected to the war in Iraq for the sole reason that innocent people were getting killed. This is a gross over simplification of the reasons people have opposed the war. Either that or I just can't understand Swampy's truncated cliche-ridden right-wing-speak.

Remember this?

We gotta stop air raiding villages and killing civilians.

There is no oversimplifying this. Killing women and children was the battle cry of Obama supporters. Now they are deaf, mum and blind.

What is striking is that he himself pretends nothing is happening while his air force air raids villages and crashes weddings.
The train has been run off into the river already. What else is he supposed to do?