04-10-2009, 06:09 PM
well, if a certain former president had his way, the SS mess would be all that much worse. remember, we still have to take care of the elderly, retirement account of whatever type - or not.
My plan to save General Motors. Could this possibly work???
|
04-10-2009, 06:09 PM
well, if a certain former president had his way, the SS mess would be all that much worse. remember, we still have to take care of the elderly, retirement account of whatever type - or not.
04-10-2009, 06:39 PM
Geez... you guys are a total buzzkill.
04-10-2009, 06:41 PM
Doc wrote: Note that AIG's insurance business is not only financially sound, but they have a huge surplus. The bailout was for the non-insurance side of the business (ie: mortgage backed securities, etc). In fact, the AIG property and casualty insurance companies may be the most financially sound insurance companies out there.
04-10-2009, 06:47 PM
macphanatic wrote: Note that AIG's insurance business is not only financially sound, but they have a huge surplus. The bailout was for the non-insurance side of the business (ie: mortgage backed securities, etc). In fact, the AIG property and casualty insurance companies may be the most financially sound insurance companies out there. "Aside from that, Mrs. Kennedy, how was your day?"
04-10-2009, 08:20 PM
Doc wrote: That's been debunked. Line-workers average under $40k. The problem is not with present salaries and benefits, which are at or below industry standards. The problem is with the mismanagement of funds set aside for the health and retirement benefits of former employees. Because the money set aside was inadequate and much of it was squandered to pay off the managers who mismanaged it, they ended up with something akin to a Ponzi scheme with present contributions going right into the pockets of past employees. That digs them ever deeper into debt as more retirees pour into the system. There is absolutely NO DOUBT that GM has been mismanaged for many years, going back to at least the early '70s. But, ALL along the way the UNION was there helping rob GM of any opportunity to be productive or competitive. Greed was on both sides of the street in this Industry! ! ! ! ! ! !
04-10-2009, 08:50 PM
They need to quit making so many different models. Take for example
the Chevy truck is available as an LS, LT1, LT2, LT3, LTZ, and SS or at least it was the last time I looked. That's way too many different models, too many different molds to make for interior and exterior parts and too many parts to keep up with. Then get rid of Pontiac, GMC, and Saturn.
Grateful11
04-10-2009, 08:53 PM
Many companies have under-funded pension plans. Many of them failed to plan on retirees living more than 7-10 years after retirement as was common 40 years ago.
04-10-2009, 09:21 PM
Doc wrote: That's been debunked. Line-workers average under $40k. I believe what was stated was a bit mis-interpreted. It was recently reported that it COSTS GM $70/hr. on average for each worker's pay AND benefit package. (The cost of an employee to the company isn't only in their salary.) I too believe that forcing the auto companies into bankruptcy and busting the unions is the only way to fix them. Can't remain globally competitive when you're paying employees 2x-3x as much as anyone else doing the same job elsewhere in the world.
04-10-2009, 10:50 PM
Oops that is what I meant. Got a little excited and fubed it. Thanks for the clarification Buckeye_Sean.
04-11-2009, 04:42 AM
MikeF wrote: This was VERY funny. An original idea? I can imagine a whole documentary series or even a Michael Moore movie on this. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|