Posts: 6,029
Threads: 68
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
I work at a state college in Georgia and I'm very aware that many of the "official rules" aren't always followed at our institution. It doesn't surprise me that you didn't get the official notification.
I wonder if that could be the basis of an appeal of any penalties...
Posts: 52,194
Threads: 2,798
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
In CA, a miscreant is notified when their CDL is suspended or revoked, whether it was done in person or not. Sometimes something slips through the cracks.
A seatbelt violation is a mover in CA. And driving with your privilege suspended or revoked is a misdemeanor, not an infraction.
And I see no problem in suspending a license because fines are not paid, regardless of how they were incurred. This is almost always done in court, and if one misses court dates, they're digging themselves a hole. If one misses their court date in CA, a warrant is usually issued, and the bail escalates with time.
I agree a notice of suspension should be sent and I disagree with the forum collective that not doing so is a conspiracy to raise revenue.
Our DMV is fairly progressive as far as conducting a lot of business online, and given that they're generally understaffed, I can see how a notice might not get sent out. I'd check to see if your DMV is supposed to send notices of suspension, or if it's not their policy.
Posts: 4,948
Threads: 160
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation:
0
Tax. They're going to get us for sure. It's like a form of tax, I think. At least I think tolls are. Course, you gotta wear ye seat belt, etc. we have to obey SOME laws that get passed. Some, mind you. Illegal aliens?
Posts: 5,015
Threads: 283
Joined: Jul 2024
Reputation:
0
My guess, is that there's simple economics in play.
$0.25 in postal, paper, administrative costs to maintain a list of those who haven't paid, and give them another chance to pay. Multiply that by what's probably tens of thousands of people a year for a state.
Now consider how many people would get that notice and say "oh i forgot to pay! And I forgot to go to court!" versus the people who say "fvck it."
I'd say most are in the latter category, especially when you consider they ignored the original citation and court date to begin with. 99% of people are not going to ignore a citation and a court date, only to pay up at a later date. If they ignored it once they'll ignore it again.
So why should the state go to the time and cost to remind people who aren't going to pay, that they have to pay.