Posts: 15,647
Threads: 1,310
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
$tevie wrote:
I find it extraordinary that anyone can whine about the fact that W appears on that poll. Don't vote for W if you don't think he deserves it. Or make your own poll that excludes W. Or go read up on W's 8 years and get a clue.
I am not complaining that W is on the list. I am saying that he is pretending to have come up with a list of all deserving presidents(@7:30 am) and W just happened to be on it. In fact, he was so fare that W was the last president he thought of. Yearh, right!
Posts: 24,926
Threads: 4,391
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
"Yeah... those drunken drug taking days."
When was Obama reported to be drunk? Are you trying to compare him to your hero - a cocaine snorting, alcoholic, AWOL, chickenhawk, semi-literate dumbass?
Posts: 7,265
Threads: 745
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation:
0
Dakota wrote:
I am not complaining that W is on the list. I am saying that he is pretending to have come up with a list of all deserving presidents(@7:30 am) and W just happened to be on it. In fact, he was so fare that W was the last president he thought of. Yearh, right!
I am guessing you live in the Central Time Zone? I live in Eastern. By 7:38 a.m. Central I have been up for more than two hours and am checking the news before heading for work. That poll was posted at 5:38 a.m. Pacific, by the way.
Does your spelling and grammar deteriorate as the day wears on, or are you drunk?
Posts: 15,647
Threads: 1,310
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
Gutenberg wrote:
[quote=Dakota]
I am not complaining that W is on the list. I am saying that he is pretending to have come up with a list of all deserving presidents(@7:30 am) and W just happened to be on it. In fact, he was so fare that W was the last president he thought of. Yearh, right!
I am guessing you live in the Central Time Zone? I live in Eastern. By 7:38 a.m. Central I have been up for more than two hours and am checking the news before heading for work. That poll was posted at 5:38 a.m. Pacific, by the way.
Does your spelling and grammar deteriorate as the day wears on, or are you drunk?
Yes to all three. I suggest you get a proof reading job to at least make some money off it.
Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Dakota wrote:
[quote=$tevie]
I find it extraordinary that anyone can whine about the fact that W appears on that poll. Don't vote for W if you don't think he deserves it. Or make your own poll that excludes W. Or go read up on W's 8 years and get a clue.
I am not complaining that W is on the list. I am saying that he is pretending to have come up with a list of all deserving presidents(@7:30 am) and W just happened to be on it. In fact, he was so fare that W was the last president he thought of. Yearh, right!
The presidents were listed in chronological order. Since I am certain you don't understand what that big word means, I will explain it to you: the presidents were listed in the order in which they served. Pierce served before Buchanan who served before Johnson who served before Bush. In fact, Bush is always last any time you list the presidents in chronological order. Even whitehouse.gov puts Bush last. Ain't that something?
Posts: 7,265
Threads: 745
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation:
0
Doc wrote:
Warren Harding doesn't make it to the short-list? Does the Teapot Dome scandal mean nothing to today's youth?
Nepotism, cronyism, partisan appointments, bribes, broken election promises ... if not for a fortuitous "suicide" half his cabinet would have ended up in prison.
Surely he makes the top 5?!
And what about Calvin Coolidge? Laissez-faire government, the breaking of the League of Nations, deregulation of banks and the subsequent destabilization of the dollar... Doesn't Coolidge deserve some recognition?
I gave Millard Fillmore, Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover a pass, but you are absolutely right, Doc, they merit a seat in the bottom ten, and Harding or Hoover would round out my top five with the bhoys who made the poll.
Posts: 5,094
Threads: 1,252
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
0
$tevie wrote:
[quote=Dakota]
[quote=$tevie]
I find it extraordinary that anyone can whine about the fact that W appears on that poll. Don't vote for W if you don't think he deserves it. Or make your own poll that excludes W. Or go read up on W's 8 years and get a clue.
I am not complaining that W is on the list. I am saying that he is pretending to have come up with a list of all deserving presidents(@7:30 am) and W just happened to be on it. In fact, he was so fare that W was the last president he thought of. Yearh, right!
The presidents were listed in chronological order. Since I am certain you don't understand what that big word means, I will explain it to you: the presidents were listed in the order in which they served. Pierce served before Buchanan who served before Johnson who served before Bush. In fact, Bush is always last any time you list the presidents in chronological order. Even whitehouse.gov puts Bush last. Ain't that something?
Be that as it may, your argument about Presidents being listed in chronological order does nothing to address Gutenberg's gender-reassignment procedure.
I'm afraid that's a terrible joke, but it's all I have. 
Posts: 15,647
Threads: 1,310
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
$tevie wrote:
[quote=Dakota]
[quote=$tevie]
I find it extraordinary that anyone can whine about the fact that W appears on that poll. Don't vote for W if you don't think he deserves it. Or make your own poll that excludes W. Or go read up on W's 8 years and get a clue.
I am not complaining that W is on the list. I am saying that he is pretending to have come up with a list of all deserving presidents(@7:30 am) and W just happened to be on it. In fact, he was so fare that W was the last president he thought of. Yearh, right!
The presidents were listed in chronological order. Since I am certain you don't understand what that big word means, I will explain it to you: the presidents were listed in the order in which they served. Pierce served before Buchanan who served before Johnson who served before Bush. In fact, Bush is always last any time you list the presidents in chronological order. Even whitehouse.gov puts Bush last. Ain't that something?
If you think your condescending attitude is going to faze me you are sadly mistaken. I am as much a street thug as your idol Obama. I am not going anywhere. Back to the topic, his point was and is to have a dig at Bush. Don't play dumb for me.
Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
I am not the one playing dumb, kiddo.
Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Or perhaps you are not playing.
|
