Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The future of the Republican Party?
#21
swampy wrote:
Well, Dennis... You'll just have to put up with me because I ain't going anywhere.

Or maybe you are. You seem to be able to change your mind fairly easily about this.

Re: Obama's Friends
Posted by: swampy
Date: October 07, 2008 03:14PM


I'm racist, I'm a criminal.

Well, that does it for me. I don't need to come here to be insulted. I didn't think that was the purpose of this forum.

I don't care if you disagree with me. You are entitled to your opinions, but calling names is uncalled for and against the rules of the MacResource Forums basic tenets.

I've enjoyed bantering with most of you. But it's turning ugly by some.

I'm outta here.

http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?2...msg-577962
Reply
#22
Dennis S wrote:
How about apologizing to the poster who said "whos" or whatever it was? You hypocrite. You don't know the difference in "capital" and "capitol", yet you snidely correct someone else?

I think it would be nice, especially since nobody mocked Swampy for using "principal" incorrectly yesterday.
Reply
#23
swampy wrote:
[quote=Don Kiyoti]
[quote=swampy]
[quote=Rick-o]
I don't really care what you think, Suzanne.

Then why do you bother posting here, Rick? Are yours supposed to be the only posts worth reading? Somebody disagrees with you and you start whining?
There are some posters (you, Dakota, and to a lesser extent, Suzanne) whos opinions really aren't worth reading. But that doesn't make Rick's opinions the only ones worth the time.
What arrogance, Don. And the correct word is "whose".
Oh well, I made a typo and left off an e. For the record, I do know about "whose" etc. I also know the meaning of arrogance, which in this case would be me insisting that my posts alone are worth reading, or that mine are the only valid opinions. Hint: opinions posted here may be worthwhile whether or not I agree with them.
Reply
#24
I didn't know swampy used "principal" incorrectly, too. I thought it was just "capitol" and "capital" she got mixed up. She jumps on a guy for a typo, yet, she herself doesn't know the difference in "principal" and "principal" and "capitol" and "capital". What a joke.
Reply
#25
She wrongly assumed that whos was "who's" without the apostrophe, rather than "whose" without the e. And we know what happens when one assumes.
Reply
#26
It's idiotic that she continues to drag this out, given the fact that her record here for misspelling is pretty bad. But, that's par for the "coarse" for ol' swampy.
Reply
#27
So sue me.
Reply
#28
Dennis S wrote:
she herself doesn't know the difference in "principal" and "principal"

Neither do you apparently.

And Professor Stevie, please help me with this. Is difference in the proper usage? Can I write what is the difference in apples and oranges, as Inspector Dennis claims?
Reply
#29
The Monday night grammar wars continue...
Reply
#30
OK. I screwed up. Let's hear swampy say it.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)