Paladino's remarks

[vision63]

He "is" within his rights. I prefer his brand of honesty. Makes it clear where he stands. For example, It beats listening to people like him go on about how eliminating DADT will affect troop morale or other kinds of dishonest drivel when you just basically hate Gay people. Same thing with people going on about "illegals" when they just hate Mexicans (which is their right), or black people or whatever. Honesty is a good thing.

[Black Tea]

vision63 wrote:
He "is" within his rights. I prefer his brand of honesty. Makes it clear where he stands. For example, It beats listening to people like him go on about how eliminating DADT will affect troop morale or other kinds of dishonest drivel when you just basically hate Gay people. Same thing with people going on about "illegals" when they just hate Mexicans (which is their right), or black people or whatever. Honesty is a good thing.

Yes, honesty is a good thing. So tell me, when did you acquire the talent to read minds in that you can tell when someone "hates" another group of people?

Actually, I find, people are much more complex than you make them out to be.

[vision63]

Black Tea wrote:
[quote=vision63]
He "is" within his rights. I prefer his brand of honesty. Makes it clear where he stands. For example, It beats listening to people like him go on about how eliminating DADT will affect troop morale or other kinds of dishonest drivel when you just basically hate Gay people. Same thing with people going on about "illegals" when they just hate Mexicans (which is their right), or black people or whatever. Honesty is a good thing.

Yes, honesty is a good thing. So tell me, when did you acquire the talent to read minds in that you can tell when someone "hates" another group of people?

Actually, I find, people are much more complex than you make them out to be.
If you had my skill and ability, a whole bunch of things would be easier for you.

[Black Tea]

vision63 wrote:
[quote=Black Tea]
[quote=vision63]
He "is" within his rights. I prefer his brand of honesty. Makes it clear where he stands. For example, It beats listening to people like him go on about how eliminating DADT will affect troop morale or other kinds of dishonest drivel when you just basically hate Gay people. Same thing with people going on about "illegals" when they just hate Mexicans (which is their right), or black people or whatever. Honesty is a good thing.

Yes, honesty is a good thing. So tell me, when did you acquire the talent to read minds in that you can tell when someone "hates" another group of people?

Actually, I find, people are much more complex than you make them out to be.
If you had my skill and ability, a whole bunch of things would be easier for you.
No, I just find that automatically labeling people as "haters" just because they want a secure border as rather simplistic, and not very honest.

[vision63]

Black Tea wrote:
[quote=vision63]
[quote=Black Tea]
[quote=vision63]
He "is" within his rights. I prefer his brand of honesty. Makes it clear where he stands. For example, It beats listening to people like him go on about how eliminating DADT will affect troop morale or other kinds of dishonest drivel when you just basically hate Gay people. Same thing with people going on about "illegals" when they just hate Mexicans (which is their right), or black people or whatever. Honesty is a good thing.

Yes, honesty is a good thing. So tell me, when did you acquire the talent to read minds in that you can tell when someone "hates" another group of people?

Actually, I find, people are much more complex than you make them out to be.
If you had my skill and ability, a whole bunch of things would be easier for you.
No, I just find that automatically labeling people as "haters" just because they want a secure border as rather simplistic, and not very honest.
That's how the lie began. Secure borders my butt. Who doesn't want security? Why oppose guest workers? Why oppose amnesty? Why oppose educating their kids? Because they hate them, that's why. [edit]: And they have no guts to be honest about it.

[$tevie]

I gotta go with vision63 on this.

The interesting thing is how upset people get when you lay the hate out in front of them. The truth hurts.

[OWC Jamie]

Dakota wrote:
Where is the controversy again?

the controversy revolves around his extreme lack of clarity and the 'backpedalling' he has had to do because of it.


He needs to take some Bill Clinton double speak lessons
(maybe more than some)



He's got the public speaking skills of a past President. And that one should have relied on a spokesperson and/or stuck to the text on the monitor like the current one.

[Black Tea]

So the 30% of Hispanics who support the Arizona law are just haters?

Right?

[vision63]

Black Tea wrote:
So the 30% of Hispanics who support the Arizona law are just haters?

Right?

Yep. If that's true.

[$tevie]

As the topic slides slowly away from hateful remarks by a politician, to polls about voter preferences...it's tough for the right wing to stay on topic, that much is for sure.